Kansas Civil Rights Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 1,706
Crawley v. Gasaway et al
as 2:2024cv02021
Plaintiff:
Annette Crawley
Defendant:
Sean Eric Gasaway, Sr., Alisha Diane O'Hara, Sherill Paige Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Spiehs v. Armbrister et al
as 5:2024cv04005
Plaintiff:
Justin Spiehs
Defendant:
Jay Armbrister, Tyler Kruzel, Jimmy Wold and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Estate of Franklin Brisbin Jr. v. Smith et al
as 2:2024cv02002
Plaintiff:
Estate of Franklin Brisbin Jr.
Defendant:
Danny Smith and John Does 1-5
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Restaurant Depot
as 2:2023cv02573
Plaintiff:
Melvin Smith, Jr. and Malik Rahman
Defendant:
Restaurant Depot
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Spiehs v. Lewis et al
as 5:2023cv04121
Plaintiff:
Dr. Justin Spiehs and Justin Spiehs
Defendant:
anthony lewis, alyse donnell, kelly jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Escalante v. Burmaster
as 2:2023cv02559
Defendant:
Paul William Burmaster and Paul Will Burmaster
Plaintiff:
Matthew Aaron Escalante
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DeVaughn v. Meade County, Kansas et al
as 2:2023cv02555
Plaintiff:
Michael O. DeVaughn
Defendant:
Meade County, Kansas and (fnu) (lnu)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Daniels et al v. USD 469 Lansing et al
as 2:2023cv02540
Plaintiff:
Vera Jane Daniels and Celeste Nicole Hoins
Defendant:
USD 469 Lansing, Marty Kobza, Amy Cawvey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Escalante v. Droege
as 2:2023cv02536
Plaintiff:
Matthew Aaron Escalante
Defendant:
Charles Droege
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Escalante v. Gardner, Kansas, City of
as 2:2023cv02529
Plaintiff:
Matthew Aaron Escalante
Defendant:
Gardner, Kansas, City of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
