US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 111 - 120 of 6,368
Sawyers v. Cleveland County Detention Center
as 5:2024cv00146
Plaintiff:
Andrew Linton Sawyers
Defendant:
Cleveland County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coker v. Stitt et al
as 5:2024cv00147
Plaintiff:
David Wayne Coker
Defendant:
Kevin Stitt, Kameron Harvanek, Matthew Sinnett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kosier v. Garvin County Jail Staff et al
as 5:2024cv00145
Plaintiff:
Austin Kosier
Defendant:
Garvin County Jail Staff and Garvin County Sheriffs Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sturm v. Goldey et al
as 5:2024cv00148
Plaintiff:
Karl Jacob Sturm
Defendant:
FNU Goldey, FNU Bouche, FNU Harvey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Prichard v. Mullet et al
as 5:2024cv00133
Plaintiff:
Ryan Prichard
Defendant:
Jim Mullet, James Richardson, Garvin County Sheriff's Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kellogg v. Aguilera et al
as 5:2024cv00135
Plaintiff:
Timothy James Kellogg
Defendant:
Tony Aguilera, Jace Gilley, Cole Jack and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sparks v. Gulickson et al
as 5:2024cv00136
Plaintiff:
Timothy William Sparks and Timothy William Schwanz
Defendant:
FNU Gulickson, FNU Bouche, FNU Goldey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cade v. USA
as 5:2024cv00130
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Darrin Cade
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Jones v. Turley
as 5:2024cv00132
Plaintiff:
Dermond C Jones, Jr.
Defendant:
Terri Turley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wright v. Garfield County Jail et al
as 5:2024cv00123
Plaintiff:
Emmanuel Wright
Defendant:
Garfield County Jail, Corey Rink and Daylyn Rivers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
