U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit Civil Rights Cases
Cases 121 - 130 of 6,339
Richard Yuengling, et al v. Rachel Floyd, et al
as 24-10249
Plaintiff:
RICHARD YUENGLING and REBECCA YUENGLING
Defendant:
RACHEL FLOYD, KURT S. BROWNING, RAY GADD and others
Irina Collier v. Donald Trump, et al
as 24-10245
Plaintiff:
IRINA COLLIER
Defendant:
DONALD TRUMP, GOVERNOR OF CALIFORNIA, GOVERNOR OF FLORIDA and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-10321
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Theodore Griffin v. Martin County, et al
as 24-10256
Plaintiff:
THEODORE KEITH GRIFFIN
Defendant:
MARTIN COUNTY, WILLIAM D. SNYDER, BRANDON GREIS and others
Mark Stinson, Sr. v. John Fowlkes, et al
as 24-10254
Plaintiff:
MARK T. STINSON, SR.
Defendant:
JOHN T FOWLKES, DAMON KEITH GRIFFIN, NATHAN PATRICK BROOKS and others
Annie Grant, et al v. Secretary, State of Georgia
as 24-10241
Plaintiff:
ANNIE LOIS GRANT, QUENTIN T. HOWELL, ELROY TOLBERT and others
Defendant:
SECRETARY, STATE OF GEORGIA
Not Yet Classified:
SERVICE
Kevin Cichowski, et al v. Andrea Totten, et al
as 24-10195
Plaintiff:
KEVIN CICHOWSKI and STANLEY CICHOWSKI, JR.
Defendant:
ANDREA K. TOTTEN and FLORIDA BAR
Alpha Phi Alpha Fraternity, Inc, et al v. Secretary, State of Georgia
as 24-10230
Plaintiff:
SIXTH DISTRICT OF THE AFRICAN METHODIST EPISCOPAL CHURCH, a Georgia nonprofit organization, ALPHA PHI ALPHA FRATERNITY, INC., a nonprofit organization on behalf of members residing in Georgia, ERIC T. WOODS and others
Defendant:
SECRETARY, STATE OF GEORGIA
Not Yet Classified:
SERVICE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-10226
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Coakley Pendergrass, et al v. Secretary, State of Georgia
as 24-10231
Plaintiff:
COAKLEY PENDERGRASS, TRIANA ARNOLD JAMES, ELLIOTT HENNINGTON and others
Defendant:
SECRETARY, STATE OF GEORGIA
Not Yet Classified:
SERVICE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
