Eleventh Circuit Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 37,064
Charles v. Fox et al
as 2:2024cv00413
Plaintiff:
Whitney J. Charles
Defendant:
Amira D. Fox, Bill Prummell, Patrick Mulvaney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Andre Twitty v. USA, et al
as 24-11422
Plaintiff:
ANDRE J. TWITTY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, B.M. ANTONELLI, Individual Capacity, C. JONES, Individual Capacity and others
Cleveland, Lamundrick v. Blizzard et al
as 1:2024cv21709
Plaintiff:
Lamundrick R. Cleveland
Defendant:
Jason T. Blizzard, Kathryn D. Weston and Amie M. Assent
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
MILES v. GRAHAM
as 5:2024cv00135
Plaintiff:
RODNEY JEROME MILES
Defendant:
MICHAEL GRAHAM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Landreth v. Withers et al
as 5:2024cv00227
Plaintiff:
David Landreth
Defendant:
Shannon Withers and George LNU
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mastella-Ellen v. Robertson et al
as 4:2024cv00118
Plaintiff:
Tanesha Mastella-Ellen
Defendant:
Sheriff Dane Robertson, Mayor Allen Pledger and Bob Covey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CUMMINGS v. CRUNK et al
as 4:2024cv00194
Plaintiff:
HORACE BENJAMIN CUMMINGS
Defendant:
WILLIAM CRUNK, KASEY M PAYNTER, JAMES R RYAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Iacono v. Woods et al
as 2:2024cv00094
Plaintiff:
Aca Daniel Iacono
Defendant:
Captain Danny Woods and Sargent Jenifer Kost
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fernandez, Jason T. v. Puentes et al
as 0:2024cv60740
Plaintiff:
Jason Tomas Fernandez
Defendant:
Yendi Puentes, Mathew Correa, Scott Shammil and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Randy Hart v. S Davis, et al
as 24-11385
Plaintiff:
RANDY A. HART
Defendant:
S DAVIS, WARDEN, T DUDLEY and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
