Eleventh Circuit Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 308
Wendall Hall v. Elizabeth Porfert, et al
as 22-12184
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WENDALL JERMAINE HALL
Defendant / Appellee:
ELIZABETH PORFERT, Clinician, PATRICK MCCAWLEY, Clinician and JON CARNER, Security Chief
Andrew Corpus v. Secretary, Department of Children & Families, et al
as 22-12181
Petitioner / Appellant:
ANDREW CORPUS
Respondent / Appellee:
JON CARNER, DAVIDSON, FLORES and others
Franklin v. Doe et al
as 3:2022cv00631
Plaintiff:
Joshua D. Franklin
Defendant:
John Doe and Warden at Florida State Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Corpus v. Monsalud et al
as 2:2022cv00326
Plaintiff:
Andrew Corpus
Defendant:
Mary Monsalud, Riddle and Baker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Corpus v. Fitzpatrick
as 2:2022cv00304
Plaintiff:
Andrew Corpus
Defendant:
Ms. Fitzpatrick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sargus v. Treasure Coast Forensic Treatment Center
as 2:2022cv14156
Plaintiff:
Edmund Charles Sargus
Defendant:
Treasure Coast Forensic Treatment Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Kash v. Sawyer et al
as 2:2022cv00284
Plaintiff:
Frank Charles Kash
Defendant:
Donald Sawyer, George Gintoli, Emily Salema and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Juan Vega v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
as 22-11352
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JUAN FRANCISCO VEGA, a.k.a. Fidel Pachino
Defendant / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
Juan Vega v. Shawn Duffee, et al
as 22-11210
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JUAN FRANCISCO VEGA
Defendant / Appellee:
SHAWN DUFFEE, DANIELLE E. KOSKEY, CARROLE DEPASS and others
Rayvon Boatman v. Administrative Director (FCCC), et al
as 22-10830
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RAYVON BOATMAN
Defendant / Appellee:
ADMINISTRATIVE DIRECTOR (FCCC), ASSISTANT TO CLINICAL DIRECTOR (FCCC), DIRECTOR OF MENTAL HEALTH (FCCC) and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
