Eleventh Circuit Labor Cases
Cases 101 - 110 of 3,016
v. Peace et al
as 8:2023cv01826
Defendant:
Summer Peace and Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 7703 Discrimination - Review of Agency Act
Peace v. Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.
as 8:2023cv01827
Plaintiff:
Summer Peace
Defendant:
Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 7703 Discrimination - Review of Agency Act
Rodriguez v. Aramark Uniform & Career Apparel, LLC
as 8:2023cv01805
Plaintiff:
Dayami Rodriguez
Defendant:
Aramark Uniform & Career Apparel, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Bouchey v. Happy's Home Centers, Inc.
as 8:2023cv01807
Plaintiff:
Robert Bouchey
Defendant:
Happy's Home Centers, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Duncan v. TELEPERFORMANCE GROUP, INC.
as 9:2023cv81135
Plaintiff:
Erica Duncan
Defendant:
TELEPERFORMANCE GROUP, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Labor
Duncan v. TPUSA, Inc.
as 1:2023cv23032
Plaintiff:
Erica Duncan
Defendant:
TPUSA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Escasena v. Federal Express Corporation et al
as 1:2023cv22961
Plaintiff:
Leticia Escasena
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation and Aetna Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Cathy Bonner v. Broward County Public Schools
as 23-12569
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CATHY BONNER
Defendant / Appellee:
BROWARD COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS
Compton v. Nachtsheim
as 2:2023cv00589
Plaintiff:
Michael Compton
Defendant:
Henry Nachsheim and Henry Nachtsheim
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Lewis v. United Parcel Service Co., Inc.
as 2:2023cv00455
Plaintiff:
Christoline Lewis
Defendant:
United Parcel Service Co., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 38 U.S.C. § 4311 Uniformed Service Employment/Reemployment Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
