Alabama Other Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 3,119
Herring v. Collection Associates Ltd et al
as 5:2024cv00589
Plaintiff:
Susan Herring
Defendant:
Collection Associates Ltd and AvanteUSA Ltd
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Hatton v. Southwest Recovery Services LLC
as 5:2024cv00583
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Hatton
Defendant:
Southwest Recovery Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
S.G. v. McGinnis
as 5:2024cv00574
Plaintiff:
S.G.
Defendant:
Michael Lee McGinnis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Langer v. Premier Recovery Solutions LLC
as 4:2024cv00546
Plaintiff:
Charles Langer
Defendant:
Premier Recovery Solutions LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Powell v. Railroad Retirement Board (MAG+)
as 3:2024cv00257
Plaintiff:
David Powell
Defendant:
Railroad Retirement Board
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 231 Railroad Retirement Act of 1974
McKnight v. CRST Lincoln Sales Inc
as 2:2024cv00516
Plaintiff:
Jeremy McKnight
Defendant:
CRST Lincoln Sales Inc doing business as CRST The Transportation Solution Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Giles v. Spring Oaks Capital LLC
as 2:2024cv00514
Plaintiff:
Krashunda Giles
Defendant:
Spring Oaks Capital LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Vestal v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv00494
Plaintiff:
James Vestal
Defendant:
MD Karen Ballard Montgomery
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 233 Civil Actions or Proceedings Against Commissioned Officers or Employees
State of Alabama et al v. Nelson
as 1:2024cv00127
Plaintiff:
STATE OF ALABAMA and ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Defendant:
Otis Nelson
In the Matter of the Appointment of Johnathan S. Ross as United States Attorney
as 2:2024mc04020
Not Yet Classified:
In the Matter of the Appointment of Johnathan S. Ross as United States Attorney
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
