Alabama Other Statutes Cases
Cases 101 - 110 of 7,308
United States Securities and Exchange Commission v. Daughtry
as 1:2024cv00125
Plaintiff:
United States Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
James Blake Daughtry
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Johnston v. InDebted USA Inc
as 3:2024cv00199
Plaintiff:
Tia DeCoito Johnston
Defendant:
InDebted USA Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00118
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
GardaWorld Federal Services, LLC et al v. Wells et al
as 2:2024mc04018
Plaintiff:
GardaWorld Federal Services, LLC and Aegis Defense Services, LLC
Defendant:
Jason B. Wells and Jackson Thornton
Conrad v. Holloway Credit Solutions LLC
as 4:2024cv00170
Plaintiff:
Michael Conrad
Defendant:
Holloway Credit Solutions LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Conrad v. Camping World Holdings Inc
as 4:2024cv00171
Plaintiff:
Michael Conrad
Defendant:
Camping World Holdings Inc
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0151 ta - Telecommunications Act of 1996
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00078
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Moore v. Hunter Warfield Inc
as 2:2024cv00162
Plaintiff:
Diamond Moore
Defendant:
Hunter Warfield Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Harrison v. Emery Insurance Group Inc.
as 2:2024cv00070
Plaintiff:
Carlton Harrison
Defendant:
Emery Insurance Group Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Z.P. et al v. Bryant
as 7:2024cv00151
Plaintiff:
Z. P., A. W. and M. L.
Defendant:
Errol Gregory Bryant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
