Alabama Labor Cases
Cases 111 - 120 of 5,191
Blom et al v. City of Gadsden Alabama
as 4:2022cv00582
Plaintiff:
Matthew R Blom, Austin T Abernathy, Joseph C Bailey and others
Defendant:
City of Gadsden Alabama
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
Click v. Mercedes-Benz US International Inc
as 2:2022cv00539
Plaintiff:
James Click
Defendant:
Mercedes-Benz US International Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Perez v. Sushivillage AL Inc
as 2:2022cv00517
Plaintiff:
Oscar G Perez
Defendant:
Sushivillage AL Inc and Sushi Village AL Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act (1993)
Ranney v. Third Worthington, Inc.
as 2:2022cv00195
Plaintiff:
Christina Ranney
Defendant:
Third Worthington, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Mitchell v. Town of Hayneville, Alabama
as 2:2022cv00198
Plaintiff:
Kelvin Mitchell
Defendant:
Town of Hayneville, Alabama
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0207 Fair Labor Standards Act
Fournier v. Autozoners, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv00192
Plaintiff:
Marie Fournier
Defendant:
Autozoners, LLC and Autozone Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Bonham et al v. Autozoners LLC et al
as 2:2022cv00493
Plaintiff:
Patricia Bonham and David Blazer, Jr
Defendant:
Autozoners LLC and AutoZone Stores Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
McDuffie v. Robinson and Waldrop Landscape LLC et al
as 4:2022cv00463
Plaintiff:
Sydney McDuffie
Defendant:
Robinson and Waldrop Landscape LLC and Jeremy Robinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Harrison, Jr. v. Billy Barnes Enterprises, Inc.
as 1:2022cv00143
Plaintiff:
Carlton D. Harrison, Jr.
Defendant:
Billy Barnes Enterprises, Inc.
Davis v. Aux Home Services LLC et al
as 2:2022cv00376
Plaintiff:
Micah Davis
Defendant:
Aux Home Services LLC, Phillip Smitherman and PJ Smitherman
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
