US District Court for the Northern District of Florida Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 101 - 110 of 14,108
EVANS v. ARCH
as 3:2024cv00127
Plaintiff:
ROGER VON EVANS
Defendant:
CAREN L ARCH
Respondent:
BROWN, RICKY DIXON and SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
GREEN v. DIXON
as 3:2024cv00125
Plaintiff:
MONTRELL D GREEN
Defendant:
RICKY DIXON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COOPER v. DOE
as 4:2024cv00138
Plaintiff:
JAMELL M COOPER
Defendant:
JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HOBBS v. CITY OF PANAMA CITY BEACH et al
as 5:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
OLANDIS DEAN HOBBS
Defendant:
CITY OF PANAMA CITY BEACH, PANAMA CITY BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT, JOHN DOES 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WRIGHT v. FITZPATRICK
as 4:2024cv00132
Plaintiff:
ROBERT LEE WRIGHT, III
Defendant:
MARTIN A FITZPATRICK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BRITTEN v. DIXON et al
as 4:2024cv00131
Plaintiff:
CORDERRO R BRITTEN
Defendant:
RICKY D DIXON, CONNER and SPREAKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. SOLITARY WATCH et al
as 4:2024cv00133
Plaintiff:
JESSIE W JONES
Defendant:
SOLITARY WATCH, DONALD J TRUMP, JOHN KIRBY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MATHEWS v. STREEIT et al
as 3:2024cv00119
Plaintiff:
CARLTON XAVIER MATHEWS
Defendant:
J STREEIT and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2024cv00050
Petitioner:
CURTIS KENNEDY WILLIAMS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
STARKS v. USA
as 4:2024cv00134
Petitioner:
EDDIE D STARKS
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
