US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia Civil Rights Cases
Cases 101 - 110 of 297
Bonds et al v. Turner et al
as 2:2015cv00192
Plaintiff:
Gregory Bonds , Sophia Bonds , Denisha Lyles and others
Defendant:
Roy Hubert Turner, Jr. and The City of Gainesville
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601
Discovery Practice Management, Inc. et al v. City of Dunwoody Zoning Board of Appeals et al
as 1:2015cv02707
Plaintiff:
Discovery Practice Management, Inc. and DV Dunwoody, LLC
Defendant:
City of Dunwoody Zoning Board of Appeals and City of Dunwoody, Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601
Mitchell v. Presbyterian Homes of Georgia, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv02718
Plaintiff:
Cherlyn Mitchell
Defendant:
Presbyterian Homes of Georgia, Inc., Thom Rochenbach, Frank H. McElroy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601
Jacobs v. Waffle House Corporate
as 1:2015cv02695
Plaintiff:
Erika Jacobs
Defendant:
Waffle House Corporate
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Graham v. Atlanta Housing Authority et al
as 1:2015cv02647
Plaintiff:
Audrey Graham
Defendant:
Atlanta Housing Authority, Joy Fitzgerald, Columbia Residential Properties and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hagler v. EZ 69/RH Windy Hill, LLC
as 1:2015cv02140
Plaintiff:
Dean Hagler
Defendant:
EZ 69/RH Windy Hill, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Hagler v. Riverstone Investments Atlanta, LLC
as 1:2015cv02146
Plaintiff:
Dean Hagler
Defendant:
Riverstone Investments Atlanta, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Hagler v. Swami I Hospitality Corporation
as 1:2015cv02144
Plaintiff:
Dean Hagler
Defendant:
Swami I Hospitality Corporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Hagler v. Prados US, LLC
as 1:2015cv02151
Plaintiff:
Dean Hagler
Defendant:
Prados US, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Hagler v. HR Hotel Management, Inc.
as 1:2015cv02135
Plaintiff:
Dean Hagler
Defendant:
HR Hotel Management, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
