Georgia Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 81 - 90 of 13,779
Leigh v. Warden of Hancock State Prison
as 1:2024cv01427
Plaintiff:
Tremaine Deshun Leigh
Defendant:
Warden of Hancock State Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
AMMONS v. BIBB COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT
as 5:2024cv00106
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY AMMONS, IV
Defendant:
BIBB COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCKINNEY v. JESTER et al
as 5:2024cv00103
Plaintiff:
CHARLIE LAMONTE MCKINNEY, JR.
Defendant:
WARDEN T JESTER, DEPUTY WARDEN M GRAHAM, DEPUTY WARDEN N BROWN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rice v. Oliver et al
as 4:2024cv00091
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Rice
Defendant:
Tyrone Oliver and Christopher M Carr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCKINNEY v. OLIVER et al
as 5:2024cv00105
Plaintiff:
CHARLIE LAMONTE MCKINNEY, JR.
Defendant:
TYRONE OLIVER, STATE BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLES, Warden ANTOINE CALDWELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dorsey v. Smith et al
as 1:2024cv01410
Plaintiff:
Julius Dorsey
Defendant:
Russell W. Smith and Chan B. Caudell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holliman v. Oliver et al
as 4:2024cv00090
Plaintiff:
Octavius Holliman
Defendant:
Tyrone Oliver, Joshua Jones, Lowe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BOWMAN v. JONES et al
as 4:2024cv00043
Petitioner:
ERICK DAWAYNE BOWMAN
Respondent:
JONES, WILLIE WILSON and RUTLEDGE STATE PRISON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WALKER v. COUNTRYMAN et al
as 4:2024cv00041
Plaintiff:
BRODRICK M WALKER
Defendant:
Sheriff GREG COUNTRYMAN and ANTONIE CALDWELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Curtis v. Gordon County Jail
as 1:2024cv01373
Plaintiff:
Dwight Dwayne Curtis
Defendant:
Gordon County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
