D.C. Circuit Civil Rights Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 296
STATE OF ALABAMA v. HOLDER
as 1:2011cv01628
Plaintiff:
STATE OF ALABAMA
Defendant:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2011cv01592
Plaintiff:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Defendant:
ERIC HOLDER, JR. and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973
STATE OF ARIZONA v. HOLDER
as 1:2011cv01559
Plaintiff:
STATE OF ARIZONA
Defendant:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973
HARRELL et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2011cv01566
Defendant:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR. and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
GLENN F. MCCONNELL and ROBERT W. HARRELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973
CULPEPER COUNTY, VIRGINIA v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2011cv01477
Plaintiff:
CULPEPER COUNTY, VIRGINIA
Defendant:
ERIC HOLDER and THOMAS E. PEREZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973
HARRELL v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2011cv01454
Defendant:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR. and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
ROBERT W. HARRELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973
Steve Schonberg v. FEC, et al
as 11-5199
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Steve Schonberg, Candidate for Congress
Defendant - Appellee:
Federal Election Commission and United States of America
JAMES CITY COUNTY, VIRGINIA v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2011cv01425
Plaintiff:
JAMES CITY COUNTY, VIRGINIA
Defendant:
ERIC HOLDER and THOMAS PEREZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973
CITY OF WILLIAMSBURG, VIRGINIA v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2011cv01415
Plaintiff:
CITY OF WILLIAMSBURG, VIRGINIA
Defendant:
ERIC HOLDER and THOMAS PEREZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973
STATE OF FLORIDA v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2011cv01428
Plaintiff:
STATE OF FLORIDA
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and ERIC H. HOLDER, JR.
Movant:
KENNETH SULLIVAN , ALBERT LEO SULLIVAN , MICHAEL BERMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
