D.C. Circuit Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 2,609
MORGAN v. JOE BIDEN
as 1:2023cv02740
Plaintiff:
DAVID BRIAN MORGAN
Defendant:
JOE BIDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MOORE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2023cv02704
Petitioner:
BRIAN MOORE
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
AKERMAN v. DOIRON
as 1:2023cv02575
Plaintiff:
MARTIN AKERMAN
Defendant:
SHERRI DOIRON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WILSON v. QUIROZ
as 1:2023cv02498
Plaintiff:
VINCENT ELLIOT WILSON
Defendant:
JOSE QUIROZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
DESIR v. NEW YORK STATE D.O.C.C.S
as 1:2023cv02366
Plaintiff:
STIVENSON DESIR
Defendant:
NEW YORK STATE D.O.C.C.S
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HILL v. UNITED STATES et al
as 1:2023cv02270
Plaintiff:
RUSSELL K. HILL
Defendant:
UNITED STATES, INTERSTATE AGREEMENT ON BOUNDARIES and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
JACK v. JACK et al
as 1:2023cv02303
Petitioner:
JOHN JACK
Respondent:
UNITED STATES, STATE OF WASHINGTON, OFFICE OF THE BISHIP - DIOCESE OF TEXARKANA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Anthony Braxton v. Superior Court of the District of Columbia
as 23-7102
Petitioner / Appellant:
Anthony Braxton
Respondent / Appellee:
Superior Court of the District of Columbia
BRYANT v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2023cv02224
Petitioner:
RONNIE LEON BRYANT
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Frank Garcia v. USA, et al
as 23-5151
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Frank Nunez Garcia
Defendant / Appellee:
United States of America, Phoenix Police Department and Jim Ahearn, FBI, Special Agent In-Charge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
