District of Columbia Prisoner Petitions Cases

Prison Condition Cases, Dockets and Filings
Cases filed
Cases 91 - 100 of 311
JAMES-BEY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv00755
Plaintiff: TERRANCE L. JAMES-BEY
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY and DEPARTMENT OF STATE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GALLIPEAU v. BUREAU OF PRISONS We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv00697
Plaintiff: DENNIS GALLIPEAU
Defendant: BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROUDABUSH v. BITTINGER et al
as 1:2015cv00545
Plaintiff: JAMES L. ROUDABUSH, JR.
Defendant: BITTINGER, MARCHANELLO, T. JONES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LAWSON v. CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
as 1:2015cv00551
Plaintiff: RONNIE JEROME LAWSON
Defendant: CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SHARRITT v. SECRETARY
as 1:2015cv00246
Plaintiff: WALTER M. SHARRITT, JR.
Defendant: SECRETARY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TINSLEY v. CLERK OF COURT We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv00167
Plaintiff: FABIAN TINSLEY
Defendant: CLERK OF COURT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SHARRITT v. BASS
as 1:2015cv00064
Plaintiff: WALTER M. SHARRITT
Defendant: EDWIN G. BASS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
AL-HAJ v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2015cv00070
Plaintiff: AHMED MOHAMMED AL-HAJ
Defendant: FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, JEFF GRONDOLSKY, CLINICAL DIRECTOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROYSTER v. GLUNT We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv00067
Plaintiff: MICHAEL ROYSTER
Defendant: GLUNT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ORTIZ-CONTRERAS v. HOLDER et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv01950
Plaintiff: LUCIO ORTIZ-CONTRERAS
Defendant: ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., HARLEY G. LAPPIN, CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?