District of Columbia Prisoner Petitions Cases

Prison Condition Cases, Dockets and Filings
Cases filed
Cases 171 - 180 of 315
STINE v. NEWTON et al
as 1:2012cv00024
Plaintiff: MIKEAL GLENN STINE
Defendant: K. NEWTON, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROUDABUSH v. HIGGS et al
as 1:2011cv02232
Plaintiff: JAMES LESTER ROUDABUSH, JR.
Defendant: JOSEPH HIGGS, PHIL GRINES, SCOTT BAIRD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON v. AHMED et al
as 1:2011cv02105
Plaintiff: OMONI JOHNSON
Defendant: MAQAS AHMED and DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DETENTION FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
BOOTH v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2011cv01782
Plaintiff: SHAUN K. BOOTH
Defendant: FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, HARLEY LAPPIN, JOYCE K. CONLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRISBANE v. LAPPIN et al
as 1:2011cv01313
Plaintiff: GEORGE H. BRISBANE
Defendant: HARLEY LAPPIN, IKE EICHENLAUB and J. F. CARAWAY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NANTAMBU v. B.O.P. et al
as 1:2011cv01216
Plaintiff: DAMANI MUATA NANTAMBU
Defendant: B.O.P., HARLEY LAPPIN, ERIC HOLDER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NESPOR v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
as 1:2011cv01214
Plaintiff: ANDREW NESPOR
Defendant: FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LEWIS v. YOST
as 1:2011cv01011
Plaintiff: JAMES LEWIS
Defendant: JOHN YOST
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GARMON v. ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDY COORDINATOR et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv00828
Plaintiff: DAVID G. GARMON
Defendant: ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDY COORDINATOR, SOUTHEAST REGIONAL ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDY, JOSEPH NEAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BURKE v. LAPPIN et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv00717
Plaintiff: STEPHEN G. BURKE
Defendant: HARLEY LAPPIN, JOYCE CONLEY, D. SCOTT DODRILL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?