Federal Circuit Other Statutes Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 40,931
NVLSP v. US
as 24-1757
Plaintiff:
NATIONAL VETERANS LEGAL SERVICES PROGRAM, NATIONAL CONSUMER LAW CENTER and ALLIANCE FOR JUSTICE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES
Appellant:
ERIC ALAN ISAACSON
Campbell v. McDonough
as 24-1760
Claimant:
RICHARD M. CAMPBELL
Respondent:
DENIS MCDONOUGH, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
MCCLURE v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2024vv00682
Petitioner:
VALERIE MCCLURE
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024vv00678
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
CHAMBERS v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2024vv00677
Petitioner:
SYMENTHA CHAMBERS
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
MASON v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2024vv00679
Petitioner:
BRANDON MASON
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
DOLS v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2024vv00675
Petitioner:
MANDY DOLS
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
ENGLE v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2024vv00681
Petitioner:
MARK ENGLE
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
SAND POINT SERVICES, LLC v. USA
as 1:2024cv00683
Plaintiff:
SAND POINT SERVICES, LLC
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
UBILES v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2024vv00680
Petitioner:
MARTA UBILES
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
