Second Circuit Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 63,132
Williams v. City of Louisville Police Dept. et al
as 1:2024cv03227
Plaintiff:
Clifton Clinton Williams, IV
Defendant:
City of Louisville Police Dept. and Victims Rights and Advocacy Human Resources
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. City of Louisville et al
as 1:2024cv03228
Plaintiff:
Clifton Clinton Williams, IV
Defendant:
City of Louisville and Publlic Affairs, Human Resources Victims Right Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Willimas v. Louisville Metro Detention Center et al
as 1:2024cv03225
Plaintiff:
Clifton Clinton Williams, IV
Defendant:
Louisville Metro Detention Center, Chief Jailer, Public Affairs and Human Resources Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Hardin County Detention Center et al
as 1:2024cv03226
Plaintiff:
Clifton Clinton Williams, IV
Defendant:
Hardin County Detention Center, J. Cinblon and Sgt. E. Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tisdale v. USA
as 6:2024cv06256
Petitioner:
Marquis Tisdale
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Young v. USA
as 6:2024cv06253
Petitioner:
James Oliver Young
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Afshar Shandiz v. State of Texas et al
as 1:2024cv03237
Plaintiff:
Ali Afshar Shandiz
Defendant:
State of Texas and Officer Fusilier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pearson v. Orange County Jail et al
as 1:2024cv03354
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03102
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Chandler v. USA
as 2:2024cv03209
Petitioner:
Andre Chandler
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
