US District Court for the District of Connecticut Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 757
Rivera Peralta v. CK Greenhouse Inc.
as 3:2021cv01693
Plaintiff:
Zoila Angelica Rivera Peralta
Defendant:
CK Greenhouse Inc.
v. Cornell et al
as 3:2021cv01540
Defendant:
Molly Cornell and Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bliss v. Bartell Machinery Systems, LLC
as 3:2021cv01530
Plaintiff:
Jayson Bliss
Defendant:
Bartell Machinery Systems, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Zappone v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 3:2021cv01187
Defendant:
Imerys Talc America, Inc., Personal Care Products Council, Johnson & Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Diana Zappone
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Beaulieu et al v. Keeper Corporation et al
as 3:2021cv01099
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Beaulieu and Rebecca Beaulieu
Defendant:
Keeper Corporation and Hampton Products International Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Langdon v. Amazon.com Services, LLC
as 3:2021cv01079
Plaintiff:
Tamera Langdon
Defendant:
Amazon.com Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Erickson et al v. Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv00986
Plaintiff:
Timothy John Erickson and Kim M. Erickson
Defendant:
Stanley Black & Decker Inc and Black & Decker (US) Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Levine v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv00857
Defendant:
Connecticut CVS Pharmacy, LLC, CVS Pharmacy, Inc. and Fourstar Group USA, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Erin Levine
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Coury v. Cactus Coatings, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv00860
Defendant:
Cactus Coatings, Inc. and G.G. Marck & Associates, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Steven E. Coury
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brayboy et al v. Fisher-Price, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv00384
Defendant:
Wal-Mart TRS, LLC, Wal-Mart, Inc, Mattel, Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Tanequa Monique Brayboy and Mickey Fred
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Wrongful Death
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
