Connecticut Real Property Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 473
29 Main Street LLC v. United States Postal Service

as 3:2019cv02003
Plaintiff:
29 Main Street LLC
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Mystic Days, LLC v. Chhatrala Mystic, LLC et al

as 3:2019cv01953
Defendant:
Kherva, LLC and Chhatrala Mystic, LLC
Plaintiff:
Mystic Days, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mystic Days, LLC v. Chhatrala Mystic, LLC et al
as 2:2019cv01953
Defendant:
Kherva, LLC and Chhatrala Mystic, LLC
Plaintiff:
Mystic Days, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Conrad et al v. US Bank National Association

as 3:2019cv01720
Plaintiff:
John W. Conrad and Elizabeth P. Conrad
Defendant:
US Bank National Association
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 191
Anderson et al v. MGC Mortgage
as 3:2019cv01518
Defendant:
MGC Mortgage
Plaintiff:
Sue Anne Anderson, Opal Greenfield and Gary Bowen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Reardon v. Monsanto Company
as 3:2019cv01316
Plaintiff:
Kevin Reardon
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
VRM v. Zackowski
as 3:2019cv01200
Defendant:
Peter P. Zackowski, IV and Peter P. Zackowski, III
Plaintiff:
VRM
JAMES J DOODY III TRUSTEE OF THE MARY Y, DOODY REVOCABLE TRUST DATED JUNE 17, 2002 v. Doody III et al
as 3:2019cv01190
Defendant:
Bank of America, N.A., James J. Doody III, Seterus, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES J DOODY III TRUSTEE OF THE MARY Y, DOODY REVOCABLE TRUST DATED JUNE 17, 2002
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Arcamone v. Kopnisky et al
as 5:2019cv01169
Defendant:
Sterling National Bank, Dovenmuehle Mortgage Inc, Monte Redman and others
Plaintiff:
Ralph Francis Arcamone, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bank of New York v. Consiglio et al

as 3:2019cv01161
Defendant:
Andrew Consiglio and Heather Lindsay
Plaintiff:
Bank of New York
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.