Connecticut Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 121 - 130 of 1,413
Orndorff v. Pullen
as 3:2022cv01637
Petitioner:
Danielle Nicole Orndorff
Respondent:
Pullen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Raynor v. Pullen
as 3:2022cv01609
Petitioner:
Alicia Raynor and Alicia Nicole Raynor
Defendant:
Pullen
Respondent:
Timethea Pullen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Schlosser v. Lamont et al
as 3:2022cv01620
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Schlosser
Defendant:
William Tong
Respondent:
Ned Lamont
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Freeman v. Pullen et al
as 3:2022cv01567
Petitioner:
Carolyn Freeman
Respondent:
Timethea Pullen, Patrick McFarland, Colette Peters and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Smith v. Pullen
as 3:2022cv01554
Petitioner:
Brenda Ann Smith
Respondent:
Pullen and Warden Timethea Pullen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Jackson v. Pullen
as 3:2022cv01542
Petitioner:
Keith Jackson
Respondent:
Pullen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Giovinco v. Pullen
as 3:2022cv01515
Petitioner:
Charles Anthony Giovinco
Respondent:
Timethea Pullen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Stabile v. Florida et al
as 3:2022cv01499
Petitioner:
Derrick Joseph Stabile
Respondent:
State of Florida and Moody
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Norwood v. USA
as 3:2022cv01492
Petitioner:
Michael Norwood
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Castillo v. Pullen
as 3:2022cv01470
Petitioner:
Higinio Castillo
Defendant:
T. Pullen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
