US District Court for the Eastern District of New York Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 4,463
Yung v. Adams et al
as 1:2024cv03304
Petitioner:
John Yung
Respondent:
N.Y.C Mayor Adams, Warden and Commissioner of NYC Dept of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Yung v. NYC Mayor Adams et al
as 1:2024cv03272
Plaintiff:
John Yung
Defendant:
NYC Mayor Adams, Warden of OBCC Rikers Island of NYC and Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Pelaez v. Lowerre
as 2:2024cv03216
Petitioner:
Julio Pelaez
Respondent:
Superintendent E. Lowerre
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Yung v. Adams et al
as 1:2024cv03004
Plaintiff:
John Yung
Defendant:
Sgt. Adams, Nyc Dept of Corrections and The People of NY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Chen v. Miller
as 1:2024cv02855
Plaintiff:
Wu Long Chen
Defendant:
M. Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Morris v. Bennett
as 1:2024cv02696
Plaintiff:
Howard Morris
Defendant:
Stacie Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Frederick v. Uhler
as 1:2024cv02513
Plaintiff:
Marquise Frederick
Defendant:
Donald J. Uhler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kaye v. McGunnes
as 1:2024cv02478
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Kaye
Defendant:
Thomas T. McGunnes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
York v. King
as 1:2024cv02449
Petitioner:
Donnell D. York
Respondent:
M King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ramos v. Miller
as 2:2024cv02273
Petitioner:
Juan Henriquez Ramos
Respondent:
Mark Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
