New York Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 111 - 120 of 14,934
Martinez Romero v. Arteta et al
as 1:2024cv00016
Petitioner:
Francisco A Martinez Romero
Respondent:
Paul Arteta, Kenneth Genalo, Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 in Habeas Corpus: INS
Hill v. Jamison
as 1:2024cv00073
Petitioner:
Eric Rodney Hill
Respondent:
Warden J. Jamison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Coley v. MJ King
as 6:2024cv06003
Petitioner:
Terry Coley
Respondent:
MJ King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Salcedo v. Kopp
as 1:2023cv09494
Plaintiff:
Santiago Salcedo
Defendant:
Ms. M. Kopp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Shabazz v. Kopp
as 9:2023cv01617
Petitioner:
Malik Shabazz
Respondent:
M. Kopp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Moore v. Superintendent of Marcy Correctional Facility
as 9:2023cv01620
Petitioner:
Gary H. Moore
Respondent:
Superintendent of Marcy Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Safran v. Superintendent
as 2:2023cv09485
Petitioner:
David Jeffrey Safran
Respondent:
Superintendent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bolton v. Ramos
as 1:2023cv09539
Petitioner:
Eric T. Bolton
Respondent:
Acting Warden Ramos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Lucas v. Commissioner of Mental Health
as 1:2023cv11274
Petitioner:
Troy Lucas
Respondent:
Commissioner of Mental Health
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jennings v. Superintendent
as 9:2023cv01618
Petitioner:
Willie Jennings
Respondent:
Superintendent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
