US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania Social Security Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 2,033
BELLMON v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2023cv04420
Plaintiff:
KARA BELLMON
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Garber v. Kijakazi,Acting Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2023cv04387
Plaintiff:
MS. SHANA GARBER
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
STANKIEWICZ v. KIJAKAZI
as 2:2023cv04274
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL P. STANKIEWICZ
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Ginder v. KIJAKAZI
as 5:2023cv04230
Plaintiff:
FRANCINE LEAH GINDER
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
BARR v. KIJAKAZI
as 2:2023cv04018
Plaintiff:
MICHELLE BARR
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
WERSCHEK v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2023cv04013
Plaintiff:
DEBORAH WERSCHEK
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
VILLANUEVA v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 5:2023cv03948
Plaintiff:
CARLOS VILLANUEVA
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
BAKKER, JR. v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2023cv03915
Plaintiff:
ROBERT T. BAKKER, JR.
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
GRAY v. KIJAKAZY
as 2:2023cv03887
Plaintiff:
REGINA GRAY
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
DAILEY v. KIJAKAZI
as 2:2023cv03882
Plaintiff:
MARY JEAN DAILEY
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
