US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania Social Security Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 5,517
Ramirez v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 5:2024cv01006
Plaintiff:
MS. MARIELENA RAMIREZ
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
SAMUEL v. O'MALLEY
as 2:2024cv01002
Plaintiff:
ALEYAMMA SAMUEL
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
BIGLEY v. O'MALLEY
as 5:2024cv00993
Plaintiff:
CHRISTY BIGLEY
Defendant:
MARTIN J O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Kralick v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 5:2024cv00998
Plaintiff:
Mr. Steven Kralick
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Laboy Gonzalez v. O'Malley
as 5:2024cv00927
Plaintiff:
Mr Kervin Javier Laboy Gonzalez
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Laboy Gonzalez
as 2:2024cv00908
Administrator:
Commissioner MARTIN O'MALLEY
Plaintiff:
Mr Kervin Javier Laboy Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
MELLWIG v. OMALLEY
as 2:2024cv00876
Plaintiff:
ROSEMARIE MELLWIG
Defendant:
MARTIN J. OMALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
GRIGGS v. O'MALLEY
as 2:2024cv00740
Plaintiff:
ZENOBIA GRIGGS
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
AMADORO v. O'MALLEY
as 2:2024cv00713
Plaintiff:
ANNA AMADORO
Defendant:
Commissioner of Soc MARTIN J O'MALLEY and MARTIN J O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
ROMAN ROSADO v. O'MALLEY
as 5:2024cv00712
Plaintiff:
LILIBETH ROMAN ROSADO
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
