US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania Social Security Cases
Cases 81 - 90 of 5,532
HOCH v. O'MALLEY
as 5:2024cv00240
Plaintiff:
HEATHER ANNE HOCH
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Griffith, III v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv00179
Plaintiff:
George V. Griffith, III
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
WEST v. O'MALLEY
as 2:2024cv00173
Plaintiff:
VICTORIA J WEST
Defendant:
Commissioner of Soc MARTIN J O'MALLEY and MARTIN J O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
CURCIO v. O'MALLEY
as 2:2024cv00131
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH CURCIO
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
GARRICK v. O'MALLEY
as 2:2024cv00142
Plaintiff:
REGINALD GARRICK
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
HOLLAND v. O'MALLEY
as 2:2024cv00121
Plaintiff:
WENDI L. HOLLAND
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
SCHWEGEL v. O'MALLEY
as 2:2024cv00092
Plaintiff:
ERIC J SCHWEGEL
Defendant:
Commissioner of Soc MARTIN J O'MALLEY and MARTIN J O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
BIGELOW v. O'MALLEY
as 2:2024cv00067
Plaintiff:
LAURA BIGELOW
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Coleman v. O'MALLEY
as 5:2024cv00056
Plaintiff:
Shane Coleman and MR. SHANE COLEMAN
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY and COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
SEXTON v. O'MALLEY
as 2:2024cv00022
Plaintiff:
DEBORAH SEXTON
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI and MARTIN J. OMALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
