US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania Intellectual Property Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 743
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 4:2024cv00708
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 4:2024cv00709
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Endless Mountain Behavioral Health Center Inc. v. Endless Mountains Extended Care, LLC
as 4:2024cv00701
Plaintiff:
Endless Mountain Behavioral Health Center Inc.
Defendant:
Endless Mountains Extended Care, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Golden Technologies, Inc. v. Pride Mobility Products Corporation
as 3:2024cv00567
Plaintiff:
Golden Technologies, Inc.
Defendant:
Pride Mobility Products Corporation
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 1:2024cv00505
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe
as 1:2024cv00506
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Woodstream Corporation v. Wu
as 1:2024cv00374
Plaintiff:
Woodstream Corporation
Defendant:
Wang Wu
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Copyright Infringement
Woodstream Corporation v. Yongjie
as 1:2024cv00375
Plaintiff:
Woodstream Corporation
Defendant:
Yao Yongjie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Copyright Infringement
Purity and Grace Inc. v. Therrien
as 1:2024cv00347
Plaintiff:
Purity and Grace Inc.
Defendant:
John Therrien
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe
as 1:2024cv00319
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
