US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania Intellectual Property Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 126
Catanzaro v. Spin Master, LTD et al
as 3:2015cv00556
Plaintiff:
David J. Catanzaro
Defendant:
Spin Master, LTD and Does 1 Through 50
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Catanzaro v. Candyrific, LLC et al
as 3:2015cv00554
Plaintiff:
David J. Catanzaro
Defendant:
Candyrific, LLC , Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., Target Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Catanzaro v. Rite Aid Corporation, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv00524
Plaintiff:
David J. Catanzaro
Defendant:
Rite Aid Corporation, Inc. and Does 1 Through 50
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Catanzaro v. Bandai America Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv00528
Plaintiff:
David J. Catanzaro
Defendant:
Bandai America Inc. and Does 1 Through 50
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Catanzaro v. Mattel, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv00527
Plaintiff:
David Catanzaro
Defendant:
Mattel, Inc., Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., Target Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Catanzaro v. Goldstein et al
as 3:2015cv00529
Plaintiff:
David J. Catanzaro
Defendant:
Benjamin Goldstein, Ben Loeb Inc., Garrett Specialties Company and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Catanzaro v. Schuster Products, LLC et al
as 3:2015cv00526
Plaintiff:
David J. Catanzaro
Defendant:
Schuster Products, LLC and DOES 1-50
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Swartz v. Sealed Power Corporation
as 4:2015cv00393
Plaintiff:
Swartz and Kevin Eugene Swartz
Counter Plaintiff:
Sealed Power Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Darby Industries, Inc. v. Tricam Industries, Inc.
as 3:2015cv00309
Plaintiff:
Darby Industries, Inc.
Defendant:
Tricam Industries, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Neurografix et al v. York Hospital et al
as 1:2015cv00109
Plaintiff:
Neurografix , Neurography Institute Medical Associates, Inc. , Image-based Surgicenter Corporation and others
Defendant:
York Hospital and Wellspan Medical Group
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
