US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania Forfeiture / Penalty Cases
Cases 131 - 140 of 155
United States Of America v. $6,808.34 in United States Currency
as 4:2007cv00326
Plaintiff:
United States Of America and United States Of America
Defendant:
$6,808.34 in United States Currency
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1955 Compl for forfeiture in Rem
United States Of America v. One 2000 Lincoln LS et al
as 4:2007cv00190
Plaintiff:
United States Of America and United States Of America
Defendant:
One 2000 Lincoln LS and One 1998 Pontiac Grand Prix
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. $1,000.100,00 in United States Currency and $74,750.00 in United States States Currency
as 1:2006cv01889
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1341 Complaint for Forfeiture
United States of America v. $35,900.13 in United States Currency
as 1:2006cv01746
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
United States Of America v. $17,000.00 in United States Currency and $6,476.00 in United States Currency
as 4:2006cv01700
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 841 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
United States of America v. Contents of Fulton Bank Account No. 3622-76161 in the names of Curtis L Hess and/or Deborah N. Hess
as 1:2006cv01690
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Complaint for Forfeiture
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Merrill Lynch Investment Account #705-64511 in the name of Deborah Bell
as 1:2006cv01249
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
Case name not on file
as 1:2006cv01118
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property - Real Estate
United States of America v. Contents of Fulton Bank Account No. 3622-76161 in the names of Curtis L. Hess and/or Deborah N. Hess
as 1:2006cv01107
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 781 Forfeiture
United States of America v. $147,393.00 in United States Currency
as 1:2006cv00836
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
