US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania Contract Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 22
TAYLOR v. STEFANKO
as 2:2010cv01660
Plaintiff:
ELIZABETH TAYLOR
Defendant:
VIOLA STEFANKO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
BRIGGS et al v. HEALTHAMERICA PENNSYLVANIA, INC.
as 2:2010cv00862
Plaintiff:
ROBERT BRIGGS and KATHY ANN BALL
Defendant:
HEALTHAMERICA PENNSYLVANIA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
KOVACH v. COVENTRY HEALTH CARE, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv00536
Plaintiff:
MARYANN KOVACH
Defendant:
COVENTRY HEALTH CARE, INC. and HEALTHAMERICA PENNSYLVANIA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
MOSKAL v. PROVIDENCE CARE CENTER, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv00398
Plaintiff:
RONALD M., MOSKAL
Defendant:
PROVIDENCE CARE CENTER, INC. and CAMPMED CASUALTY & INDEMNITY COMPANY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
PAPCIAK v. SEBELIUS
as 2:2009cv01354
Plaintiff:
MARY BETH PAPCIAK
Defendant:
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
BROWN v. UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION
as 2:2008cv01748
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM E. BROWN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. MID-STATE MEDICAL GROUP, INC.
as 3:2008cv00026
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
MID-STATE MEDICAL GROUP, INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
UPMC-BRADDOCK HOSPITAL v. LEAVITT
as 2:2007cv01618
Plaintiff:
UPMC-BRADDOCK HOSPITAL
Defendant:
MICHAEL O. LEAVITT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
SEWICKLEY VALLEY HOSPITAL v. MICHAEL O. LEAVITT
as 2:2007cv00869
Plaintiff:
SEWICKLEY VALLEY HOSPITAL and THE MEDICAL CENTER, BEAVER, PA
Defendant:
MICHAEL O. LEAVITT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
UPMC ST. MARGARET HOSPITAL v. LEAVITT
as 2:2006cv01237
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
