Pennsylvania Other Statutes Cases
Cases 211 - 220 of 987
CICCOTELLI v. PROSPECTA INC. et al
as 2:2021cv01863
Defendant:
PAMELA KIMMET, MIKE VENTLING, RAMZI MUSALLAM and others
Plaintiff:
ALEX CICCOTELLI
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
REDFIELD v. FBL FINANCIAL INC. et al
as 2:2021cv01795
Defendant:
CRAIG D HILL, PAUL E LARSON, ROGER K BROOKS and others
Plaintiff:
PAUL A JUFFER and DENISE REDFIELD
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
CICCOTELLI v. CANTEL MEDICAL CORP. et al
as 2:2021cv01756
Defendant:
LAURA FORESE, PETER PRONOVOST, CANTEL MEDICAL CORP. and others
Plaintiff:
ALEX CICCOTELLI
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
WAITS v. GLU MOBILE INC. et al
as 2:2021cv01738
Defendant:
GLU MOBILE INC., HANY NADA, GREG BRANDEAU and others
Plaintiff:
ERIC WAITS
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
WATERMAN v. BOSTON PRIVATE FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv01736
Defendant:
GLORIA C LARSON, LUIS A UBINAS, MARK F FURLONG and others
Plaintiff:
MARC WATERMAN
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
JUSTICE v. CUBIC CORPORATION et al
as 2:2021cv01671
Defendant:
BRUCE G BLAKLEY, JANICE M HAMBY, CUBIC CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY D. JUSTICE, II.
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
ARTIS v. CHANGE HEALTHCARE INC. et al
as 2:2021cv01639
Defendant:
NICHOLAS L KUHAR, PHILLIP M PEAD, BANSI NAGJI and others
Plaintiff:
DERRICK L ARTIS
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
CICCOTELLI v. GENMARK DIAGNOSTICS, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv01626
Defendant:
GERONIMO ACQUISITION CORP., JAMES FOX, LISA GILES and others
Plaintiff:
ALEX CICCOTELLI
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
JUSTICE v. CORELOGIC, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv01542
Defendant:
CLAUDIA FAN MUNCE, W. STEVE ALBRECHT, JAYNIE MILLER STUDENMUND and others
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY D. JUSTICE, II.
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
CICCOTELLI v. FIVE PRIME THERAPEUTICS, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv01512
Defendant:
FRANKLIN ACQUISITION SUB, INC., GARRY NICHOLSON, PEDER K JENSEN and others
Plaintiff:
ALEX CICCOTELLI
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
