US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania Other Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 143
United States Securities and Exchange Commission v. Poerio
as 2:2024cv00700
Plaintiff:
United States Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Frank T. Poerio, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. ยง 22 Securities Fraud
PLUMBERS AND PIPEFITTERS LOCAL UNION NO. 719 PENSION TRUST FUND v. DICKS SPORTING GOODS, INC. et al
as 2:2024cv00196
Plaintiff:
PLUMBERS AND PIPEFITTERS LOCAL UNION NO. 719 PENSION TRUST FUND
Defendant:
DICKS SPORTING GOODS, INC., EDWARD W STACK, NAVDEEP GUPTA and others
McCOLLUM v. GOETTLER et al
as 2:2023cv01658
Plaintiff:
PORTIA McCOLLUM
Defendant:
MICHAEL GOETTLER, W. DON CORNWELL, ROBERT J. COURY and others
Not Classified By Court:
VIATRIS, INC.
MAXWELL v. POWER INNOVATIONS, INC. et al
as 2:2023cv01493
Plaintiff:
JAMES MAXWELL
Defendant:
POWER INNOVATIONS, INC., KIMBERLY KELLY, SCOTT KELLY and others
SCHEINER v. GOETTLER et al
as 2:2023cv01446
Plaintiff:
JACOB SCHEINER
Defendant:
MICHAEL GOETTLER, W. DON CORNWELL, ROBERT J. COURY and others
MEEHAN v. VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS, INC. et al
as 2:2023cv01375
Plaintiff:
GEORGE MEEHAN
Defendant:
VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS, INC., HANS VESTBERG and MATTHEW ELLIS
MCCORD v. VIATRIS INC. et al
as 2:2023cv01098
Plaintiff:
KATHRYN P. MCCORD and EASTERN ATLANTIC STATES CARPENTERS PENSION, ANNUITY AND HEALTH FUNDS (EASC)
Defendant:
VIATRIS INC., MICHAEL GOETTLER, RAJIV MALIK and others
Petitioner:
Charles Mizerany
TAYLOR v. VIATRIS INC et al
as 2:2023cv00812
Plaintiff:
JASON TAYLOR
Defendant:
VIATRIS INC, MICHAEL GOETTLER, RAJIV MALIK and others
DRIVER OPPORTUNITY PARTNERS I, LP v. ADAMS et al
as 3:2023cv00056
Plaintiff:
DRIVER OPPORTUNITY PARTNERS I, LP
Defendant:
J. MICHAEL ADAMS, JR., AMY BRADLEY, ALLAN R. DENNISON and others
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. RAYAPUREDDY
as 2:2022cv01592
Plaintiff:
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Defendant:
RAMKUMAR V. RAYAPUREDDY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
