U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit Forfeiture / Penalty Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 43
Harry T. Lewis v. United States Government
as 17-1860
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HARRY T. LEWIS
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT, HONORABLE RICHARD MARK GERGEL and STANLEY D. RAGSDALE
US v. 3 Knife-Shaped Coins
as 17-1625
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Claimant - Appellant:
ANCIENT COIN COLLECTORS GUILD
Defendant:
3 KNIFE-SHAPED COINS, 12 OTHER CHINESE COINS, 7 CYPRIOT COINS and others
US v. Daniel Buczek
as 16-7639
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Claimant - Appellant:
DANIEL R. BUCZEK
Defendant:
BERNARD VON NOTHAUS
William Black v. US
as 16-2129
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM H. BLACK and LINDA WILSON
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
US v. Hung Tran
as 16-1749
Plaintiff - Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Claimant - Appellee:
HUNG NGOC TRAN
Defendant:
$116,850 IN U.S. CURRENCY
Kenneth Watford v. US
as 16-6810
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH WAYNE WATFORD
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-1409
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Harold O'Neal v. US
as 16-6053
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HAROLD LEE O'NEAL
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
US v. Thomas Bednar
as 15-2232
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Claimant - Appellant:
MARLA M. BEDNAR and THOMAS G. BEDNAR
Defendant:
FUNDS CONTAINED IN THE BETTER BUSINESS CHECKING ACCOUNT NUMBERED 802070987 and THE BUSINESS SWEEP ACCOUNT NUMBERED 802121715 AT CAPITAL BANK, UP TO $359,557.25 IN THE NAME OF MARLA BEDNAR, d/b/a Marla Enterprises
US v. Bank of America, N.A.
as 15-6854
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Party-in-Interest - Appellant:
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.
Defendant:
VIRESH PATEL, a/k/a Vic, ANJAY RAVINDRABHAI PATEL, a/k/a Jay, a/k/a Ramesh Raval, a/k/a Anjay Patel, JOSEPH EMMANUEL and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
