Maryland Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 151 - 160 of 17,458
Thomas v. Wiley et al
as 1:2024cv01912
Plaintiff:
Eric Ronnell Thomas
Defendant:
Lt. Marvin Metz, Lt. Patrica Wiley, Lt. Bennett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Germain v. Akintade et al
as 1:2024cv01886
Plaintiff:
Jean Bernard Germain
Defendant:
M. Butler and Ms. Akintade
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Weddington v. Patuxent Institution et al
as 1:2024cv01887
Plaintiff:
Robert C. Weddington
Defendant:
Sgt. Dawn Hasley and Patuxent Institution
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Blanchard v. Nichols et al
as 1:2024cv01888
Defendant:
C. Phillip Nichols and Thomas D. Gorman, Esq.
Plaintiff:
Ray Blanchard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Berrios v. State of Maryland
as 1:2024cv01755
Respondent:
State of Maryland
Petitioner:
Osbaldo Lemus Berrios
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01837
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Horne v. USA
as 1:2024cv01871
Defendant:
USA
Plaintiff:
Gregory J. Horne
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Stitely v. John's Hopkins Otolaryngology et al
as 1:2024cv01872
Defendant:
John's Hopkins Otolaryngology and Alenezi Abdulrahman
Plaintiff:
David Stitely
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark-El v. The Department of Correction et al
as 1:2024cv01884
Defendant:
The Department of Correction, Captain: Venable, Warden of (JCI), Mr. Robert Dean and others
Plaintiff:
Hammel J. Clark-El
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Collick v. Willey
as 1:2024cv01874
Defendant:
Connor Willey
Plaintiff:
Riley Lee Collick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
