Maryland Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 17,214
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01107
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 5 U.S.C. § 1158 Immigration & Nationality Act, Section 208 (Asylum)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01106
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 5 U.S.C. § 1158 Immigration & Nationality Act, Section 208 (Asylum)
Stuckey v. Weber et al
as 1:2024cv01104
Petitioner:
Kai A. Stuckey
Respondent:
R. Shane Weber and Maryland Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Morant v. The Warden et al
as 1:2024cv01105
Plaintiff:
Tavis Davon Morant
Defendant:
The Warden and Officers of the Warden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Holtzinger v. Clerk Kevin R. Tucker
as 1:2024cv01088
Plaintiff:
Patrick Landon Holtzinger
Defendant:
Clerk Kevin R. Tucker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Witherspoon v. Weber
as 1:2024cv01084
Petitioner:
Edward Witherspoon
Respondent:
Warden Ronald S. Weber
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bradby v. Blankenship et al
as 1:2024cv01087
Plaintiff:
David Bradby
Defendant:
Julia Blankenship and Niles Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Powell v. USA-2255
as 1:2024cv01092
Petitioner:
Devon Powell
Respondent:
USA-2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Barnes v. Henry et al
as 1:2024cv01077
Plaintiff:
Robert Earl Barnes, Jr.
Defendant:
J. Henry, R. Barnes, Hetz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Macey v. State of Maryland et al
as 1:2024cv01073
Petitioner:
Teddy Allan Macey
Respondent:
State of Maryland and United States District Ct
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
