US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 140
HERESH v. EARL et al
as 1:2017cv00969
Plaintiff:
DAVID HERESH
Defendant:
BENJAMIN ADAM EARL and PLOTTS WATER SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BURNETT v. INGRAHM et al
as 1:2017cv00944
Plaintiff:
SOPHIA LOREN BURNETT
Defendant:
MATTHEW JAMES INGRAHM and WERNER ENTERPRISES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
GRACIANO V. BLUE SKY LOGISTICS LLC, ET AL.
as 1:2017cv00889
Defendant:
BLUE SKY LOGISTICS LLC and MICHAEL KEVIN BALES
Plaintiff:
CASIMIRO GRACIANO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SOLTYS V. ROBERTSON, ET AL.
as 1:2017cv00606
Defendant:
RAYMOND CARROLL ROBERTSON, JR. and J & D LANCASTER, INC
Plaintiff:
ADAM P. SOLTYS
Mediator:
GARY S. HEMRIC
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134
SHOWS V. WILKINS, ET AL.
as 1:2017cv00568
Defendant:
ANDREW CHARLES WILKINS , ASHFORD TRS SAPPHIRE VI LLC and REMINGTON HOTELS, LLC
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS C. SHOWS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ALIKSA v. NORTH CAROLINA RAILROAD COMPANY et al
as 1:2017cv00428
Plaintiff:
FELIX ALIKSA
Defendant:
NORTH CAROLINA RAILROAD COMPANY, CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC. , CSX CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
VAUGHN v. MASON
as 1:2017cv00141
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY M. VAUGHN
Defendant:
THOMAS LEE MASON and FINKLE IV FREIGHT AND LOGISTICS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SWINK v. SHIRLEY, et al
as 1:2016cv01393
Plaintiff:
CARLIE WHITE SWINK
Defendant:
BRIAN RAY SHIRLEY and AUSTIN INDUSTRIES, INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
GIBSON et al v. HOOVER TRANSPORTATION SERVICES, INC. et al
as 1:2016cv01084
Plaintiff:
DONNA GIBSON and RUSS GIBSON
Defendant:
HOOVER TRANSPORTATION SERVICES, INC. and MARION ALPHONSE JAMES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
SIMMONS v. PILCHER et al
as 1:2016cv00559
Plaintiff:
CALVIN SIMMONS
Defendant:
THEODORE PILCHER , ALVIN BARBER , WEO TRUCKS, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
