Virginia Intellectual Property Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 1,433
Audio Pod IP, LLC v. Amazon.Com, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00444
Plaintiff:
Audio Pod IP, LLC
Defendant:
Amazon.Com, Inc., Amazon.Com LLC, Amazon Web Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 281 Patent Infringement
VLSI Technology LLC v. Patent Quality Assurance, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00438
Plaintiff:
VLSI Technology LLC
Defendant:
Patent Quality Assurance, LLC and Joseph Uradnik
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 1 Patent Non-Infringement - Declaratory Judgment
Audio Pod IP, LLC v. Amazon.Com, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00185
Plaintiff:
Audio Pod IP, LLC
Defendant:
Amazon.Com, Inc., Amazon.Com LLC, Amazon Web Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 281 Patent Infringement
VLSI Technology LLC v. Patent Quality Assurance, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00213
Plaintiff:
VLSI Technology LLC
Defendant:
Patent Quality Assurance, LLC and Joseph Uradnik
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 1 Patent Non-Infringement - Declaratory Judgment
Hyatt v. Vidal
as 1:2024cv00374
Plaintiff:
Gilbert P. Hyatt
Defendant:
Katherine K. Vidal
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
Bayerische Motoren Werke AG et al v. Foras Technologies Ltd.
as 1:2024cv00363
Plaintiff:
Bayerische Motoren Werke AG and Robert Bosch GmbH
Defendant:
Foras Technologies Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Hyatt v. Vidal
as 1:2024cv00329
Plaintiff:
Gilbert P. Hyatt
Defendant:
Katherine K. Vidal
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
Leisure Products, Inc. v. Trike Shop of Minnesota, Inc
as 3:2024cv00011
Plaintiff:
Leisure Products, Inc. doing business as California Sidecar
Defendant:
Trike Shop of Minnesota, Inc doing business as Roadsmith Trikes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Patent Infringement
Hyatt v. Vidal
as 1:2024cv00278
Plaintiff:
Gilbert P. Hyatt
Defendant:
Katherine K. Vidal
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
Schindler v. Vidal
as 1:2024cv00262
Plaintiff:
Edwin D. Schindler
Defendant:
Kathi Vidal
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1071 Appeal of Decision of U.S. Patent & Trademark Office
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
