Virginia Intellectual Property Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 1,434
Hyatt v. Vidal
as 1:2023cv01728
Plaintiff:
Gilbert P. Hyatt
Defendant:
Katherine K. Vidal
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
Secure NFC PTY. LTD. v. Mastercard Incorporated
as 1:2023cv01717
Plaintiff:
Secure NFC PTY. LTD.
Defendant:
Mastercard Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Secure NFC PTY. LTD. v. Mastercard Incorporated
as 3:2023cv00853
Plaintiff:
Secure NFC PTY. LTD.
Defendant:
Mastercard Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
HL Klemove Corp. v. Foras Technologies Ltd.
as 2:2023cv00647
Plaintiff:
HL Klemove Corp.
Defendant:
Foras Technologies Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
HL Klemove Corp. v. Foras Technologies Ltd.
as 1:2023cv01689
Plaintiff:
HL Klemove Corp.
Defendant:
Foras Technologies Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Hyatt v. Vidal
as 1:2023cv01676
Plaintiff:
Gilbert P. Hyatt
Defendant:
Katherine K. Vidal
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
Iron Horse Transport, LLC v. Det Diesel Emission Technologies, LLC et al
as 7:2023cv00791
Plaintiff:
Iron Horse Transport, LLC doing business as DPF Alternatives of Roanoke
Defendant:
Det Diesel Emission Technologies, LLC and Synergy Catalyst, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Hyatt v. Vidal
as 1:2023cv01637
Plaintiff:
Gilbert P. Hyatt
Defendant:
Katherine K. Vidal
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
Mission Integrated Technologies, LLC et al v. Clemente et al
as 1:2023cv01608
Plaintiff:
Mission Integrated Technologies, LLC and F2E Holdings LLC
Defendant:
Joshua Clemente, Timothy G. Clemente and Joshua R. Clemente
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 281 Patent Infringement
SES-imagotag GmbH, et al v. Hanshow Technology Co., Ltd.
as 1:2023cv01601
Plaintiff:
SES-imagotag GmbH and SES-imagotag SA
Defendant:
Hanshow Technology Co., Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 1 Patent Non-Infringement - Declaratory Judgment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
