US District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 1,687
Gottfried v. Pacholke
as 5:2023cv00284
Plaintiff:
Michael Gottfried
Defendant:
Correctional Officer C. Pacholke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Wilson v. Searls et al
as 5:2023cv00283
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Lee Wilson
Defendant:
Shelby Searls, William Marshall, III, Jeff Sandy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Akers v. Conover
as 5:2023cv00279
Plaintiff:
Montgomery Carl Akers
Defendant:
Jaime Conover
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Larry v. Doe et al
as 3:2023cv00191
Plaintiff:
Orlando Larry
Defendant:
John Doe, or in the Alternative, Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Montgomery v. Jones et al
as 5:2023cv00274
Petitioner:
Jasman Raheem Montgomery
Respondent:
Gregory Jones, Shelby Searls and Investigators
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Allman v. Tibbs et al
as 3:2023cv00187
Plaintiff:
Ronald Allman, II
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Tibbs, Correctional Officer Sams and Corr. Officer II Reed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Byrd v. Brill
as 5:2023cv00273
Plaintiff:
Kevin Byrd
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Brill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gottfried v. Pacholke
as 3:2023cv00183
Plaintiff:
Michael Gottfried
Defendant:
Correctional Officer C. Pacholke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Jackson v. John/Jane Doe et al
as 5:2023cv00270
Plaintiff:
Olando Jackson, Jr.
Defendant:
John/Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Watts v. Burkey
as 5:2023cv00264
Plaintiff:
Jack R. Watts
Defendant:
CO II Correctional O Harley Burkey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
