West Virginia Other Statutes Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Mey v. Levin, Papantonio, Rafferty, Proctor, Buchanan, OBrien, Barr, & Mougey P.A. et al
as 5:2023cv00046
Plaintiff:
Diana Mey
Defendant:
Levin, Papantonio, Rafferty, Proctor, Buchanan, OBrien, Barr, & Mougey P.A., Principal Law Group, LLC, MCM Services Group LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Mey v. The Baltimore Life Insurance Company
as 5:2022cv00266
Plaintiff:
Diana Mey
Defendant:
The Baltimore Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Frank v. Police and Sheriff Support Alliance
as 5:2021cv00088
Plaintiff:
Michael Frank
Defendant:
Police and Sheriff Support Alliance
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Mey v. Matrix Warranty Solutions, Inc. et al
as 5:2021cv00062
Plaintiff:
Diana Mey
Defendant:
John Doe Defendants 1-5, SING for Service, LLC, Matrix Financial Services, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Baldwin v. Discover Bank
as 1:2021cv00217
Plaintiff:
Laura Baldwin
Defendant:
Discover Bank
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Knight v. Sequium Asset Solutions, LLC
as 3:2021cv00168
Plaintiff:
Kristina Knight
Defendant:
Sequium Asset Solutions, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Tabor v. GreenSky, LLC
as 3:2021cv00001
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Tabor
Defendant:
GreenSky, LLC doing business as Home Depot Loan Services
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Sampson v. Tri-State Emergency Physicians, LLP et al
as 5:2020cv00255
Defendant:
Tri-State Emergency Physicians, LLP and United Collection Bureau, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Shari Sampson
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Tinnel v. Ford Motor Credit Company, LLC
as 3:2020cv00667
Defendant:
Ford Motor Credit Company, LLC
Plaintiff:
John Tinnel
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Mey v. G1 Consulting, Inc. et al
as 5:2020cv00087
Defendant:
G1 Consulting, Inc., Burton Roark, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Diana Mey
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
