US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Intellectual Property Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 16,058
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 4:2024cv00340
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
RecepTrexx LLC v. Vivint, Inc.
as 2:2024cv00268
Plaintiff:
RecepTrexx LLC
Defendant:
Vivint, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Facet Technology Corp. v. Here Global B.V.
as 2:2024cv00269
Plaintiff:
Facet Technology Corp.
Defendant:
Here Global B.V.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Linfo IP, LLC v. J.Crew Group, Inc.
as 2:2024cv00266
Plaintiff:
Linfo IP, LLC
Defendant:
J.Crew Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
S3G Technology LLC v. Hot Topic, Inc.
as 5:2024cv00056
Plaintiff:
S3G Technology LLC
Defendant:
Hot Topic, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 4:2024cv00338
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 4:2024cv00339
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Luxottica Group, S.p.A., an Italian Corporation et al v. Abdelrahman et al
as 4:2024cv00329
Plaintiff:
Luxottica Group, S.p.A., an Italian Corporation and Oakley, Inc., a Washington Corporation
Defendant:
Hosam Abdelrahman and Rogena Abdelrahman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Trademark
Wearable Shoe Tree, LLC v. Does 1-601
as 4:2024cv00334
Plaintiff:
Wearable Shoe Tree, LLC
Defendant:
Does 1-601
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Maxeon Solar Pte. Ltd. v. REC Solar Holdings AS
as 2:2024cv00260
Plaintiff:
Maxeon Solar Pte. Ltd.
Defendant:
REC Solar Holdings AS
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
