US District Court for the Southern District of Texas Contract Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 116
Dudenhoeffer v. Christmann et al
as 4:2021cv02272
Plaintiff:
Barry Dudenhoeffer
Defendant:
John J. Christmann, IV, John E. Lowe, Annell R. Bay and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Brodeen v. Christmann et al
as 4:2021cv02082
Defendant:
John J. Christmann, IV, Peter A. Ragauss, Chansoo Joung and others
Plaintiff:
Rawley Brodeen
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109
Miskella v. Christmann et al
as 4:2021cv01836
Defendant:
John J. Christmann, IV, Peter A. Ragauss, Chansoo Joung and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Miskella
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109
Vardoulakis v. Neri
as 4:2021cv01694
Defendant:
Eduardo Neri
Plaintiff:
Alexios Vardoulakis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv01282
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GEDA USA Holdings, Inc. v. Calles et al
as 3:2021cv00057
Plaintiff:
GEDA USA Holdings, Inc.
Defendant:
Herbert Calles and Elevator Worx & Industrial Equipment, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Huang et al v. Chang
as 4:2020cv03306
Plaintiff:
Alice Huang, Christine Huang and Steven Huang
Defendant:
Alison Chang
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Holliday et al v. Crowley et al
as 4:2020cv02218
Defendant:
Francisco Gras, David J Crowley, Randall Stafford and others
Plaintiff:
Trustee Mark E Holliday, GOK Liquidating Trust and Mark E Holliday
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334
Miller v. Cadence Bancorporation et al
as 4:2019cv03492
Defendant:
Paul B. Murphy, Valerie C. Toalson, Cadence Bankcorporation and others
Plaintiff:
Frank Miller
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
Ludovissy et al v. Bellicum Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 4:2019cv02450
Defendant:
Kevin M. Slawin, Reid M. Huber, James M. Daly and others
Plaintiff:
Scott Ludovissy and Ann Gordon Trammell
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
