US District Court for the Southern District of Texas Labor Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 271
Hill v. 3M Company et al
as 3:2023cv00309
Plaintiff:
Joseph C. Hill
Defendant:
3M Company and Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA)
Price v. City of Dickinson
as 3:2023cv00291
Plaintiff:
William Frank Price
Defendant:
City Of Dickinson, Texas and City of Dickinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Romero v. Rock Solid Precast, LP et al
as 4:2023cv03375
Plaintiff:
Geovanny Romero
Defendant:
Rock Solid Precast, LP and Bryan Saunders
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Gutierrez v. OTS Acquisition Group LLC
as 7:2023cv00277
Plaintiff:
Fernando Gutierrez, Jr.
Defendant:
OTS Acquisition Group LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA)
Flores v. The GI Alliance Management LLC
as 4:2023cv02682
Plaintiff:
Coriena Flores
Defendant:
The GI Alliance Management LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA)
Berryhill v. City Of Edinburg
as 7:2023cv00235
Plaintiff:
Wesley Berryhill
Defendant:
City Of Edinburg
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA)
Lopez v. Indorama Ventures Oxides LLC
as 4:2023cv02453
Plaintiff:
Athena Lopez
Defendant:
Indorama Ventures Oxides LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA)
Puente v. Hebco GP, LLC.
as 4:2023cv02395
Plaintiff:
Nefty Puente
Defendant:
Hebco GP, LLC. doing business as HEB Grocery Company, LP
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA)
Henry v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 4:2023cv02309
Plaintiff:
John Henry
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv02303
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
