US District Court for the Western District of Texas Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 19,751
Hester v. Lee
as 6:2024cv00398
Defendant:
Stephen N Lee
Plaintiff:
Kendrick Hester
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Collier v. McNamara
as 6:2024cv00397
Petitioner:
Christopher Collier
Respondent:
Parnell McNamara
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ramirez v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00255
Respondent:
Cheron Y. Nash
Petitioner:
Jose Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Burton v. Ector Co Sheriffs Department et al
as 7:2024cv00172
Defendant:
Ector County Detention Center and Ector Co Sheriffs Department
Plaintiff:
Amy Nicole Burton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ochoa v. Quintana et al
as 7:2024cv00173
Defendant:
Midland County Detention Center, Cpl. FNU Alcatraz, Officer B. Quintana and others
Plaintiff:
Edward Jesus Ochoa
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramirez v. Warden FCI La Tuna-Camp
as 3:2024cv00254
Petitioner:
Moises Ramirez
Respondent:
Warden FCI La Tuna-Camp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Wigley v. Smith
as 1:2024cv00839
Respondent:
Kevin B. Smith
Petitioner:
Troy Wigley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Chavez v. Warden FCI La Tuna Camp
as 3:2024cv00249
Petitioner:
Raul Chavez
Respondent:
Warden FCI La Tuna Camp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Carrasco v. Warden FCI La Tuna-Camp
as 3:2024cv00250
Respondent:
Warden FCI La Tuna-Camp
Petitioner:
Erbey Carrasco
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Robles v. Warden FCI La Tuna Camp
as 3:2024cv00252
Respondent:
Warden FCI La Tuna Camp
Petitioner:
Ricardo Robles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
