Sixth Circuit Social Security Cases
Cases 161 - 170 of 37,150
Wiles v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv01072
Plaintiff:
Dameon Wiles
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 427 Social Security Benefits
Middle v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00212
Plaintiff:
Lorri Marie Middle
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Baker v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2024cv00054
Plaintiff:
Wendy Dawn Baker
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Goodwin v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2024cv00589
Plaintiff:
Amy Goodwin
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision
Hughes v. SSA
as 6:2024cv00046
Plaintiff:
Thomas Hughes, Jr.
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Cornette v. SSA
as 7:2024cv00030
Plaintiff:
Rhonda Jean Cornette
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Pring v. Social Security, Commissioner of
as 1:2024cv00328
Plaintiff:
Matthew John Pring
Defendant:
Social Security, Commissioner of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of Social Security Decision (SSID)
Filing Error
as 1:2024cv00584
Plaintiff:
M Lenihan Tracey
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 425 Social Security Benefits
Lenihan v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00585
Plaintiff:
Tracey M. Lenihan
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 425 Social Security Benefits
Heckert v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00022
Plaintiff:
Bonnie Heckert
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA-Email Notification
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
