Kentucky Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 5,299
Huffman v. Robey et al
as 3:2025cv00093
Plaintiff:
James R. Huffman, IV
Defendant:
Amy Robey, Kentucky Department of Corrections, Elaine Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meyer v. Bishop
as 5:2025cv00021
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Paul Meyer
Defendant:
Kevin Bishop
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marruquin v. Henderson County Detention Center et al
as 4:2025cv00015
Plaintiff:
Calvin Ray Marruquin
Defendant:
Henderson County Detention Center and Justin Whitaker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moffatt v. Durham et al
as 3:2025cv00007
Plaintiff:
Johnminique Moffatt
Defendant:
Amanda Durham and Kimberly Damon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rollins v. Burkhart et al
as 5:2025cv00039
Plaintiff:
James B. Rollins
Defendant:
Misty Burkhart, Well Path, Core Civic and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Martin et al
as 5:2025cv00040
Plaintiff:
Ryan Lee Moore
Defendant:
Christopher Martin, Gregory Hounshell, Johnny Peters and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cox v. United States Department of Justice et al
as 3:2025cv00088
Plaintiff:
Welby Thomas Cox, Jr.
Defendant:
United States Department of Justice, Centerville Indiana Chief of Police, Carolyn Jay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smallwood v. Paul et al
as 5:2025cv00037
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Smallwood
Defendant:
Warden David Paul, Warden Sizemore, Captain Bayer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Martin v. Smith et al
as 2:2025cv00021
Plaintiff:
Joshua I. Martin
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moffatt v. Durham et al
as 3:2025cv00078
Plaintiff:
Johnminique Moffatt
Defendant:
Amanda Durham and Kimberly Damon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
