Kentucky Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 12,857
Thomas v. USA
as 5:2024cv00061
Petitioner:
Reginald R. Thomas
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Mitchell v. Knight
as 5:2024cv00059
Plaintiff:
Cindy Mitchell
Defendant:
David Knight
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mitchell v. Cook et al
as 5:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
Cindy Mitchell
Defendant:
Detective Dylan Cook, Detective Beau Green and Sgt. Matthew Scheer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Perkins v. Dallam et al
as 3:2024cv00226
Plaintiff:
Gavin Perkins
Defendant:
Ramsey Dallam, Steve Conrad, Detective Snyder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martinez v. Warden FCI Ashland
as 0:2024cv00042
Petitioner:
Jonathan Martinez
Respondent:
Warden FCI Ashland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Violett v. Grise et al
as 1:2024cv00058
Petitioner:
Donald Ray Violett
Respondent:
Judge John R. Grise and Warden Anna Valentine
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McNichols v. Hatton et al
as 5:2024cv00057
Plaintiff:
Charles R. McNichols
Defendant:
Deputy Warden Chris Hatton, Captain Zackary Eubanks, Warden Bobbi Jo Butts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McNichols v. Kentucky Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2024cv00058
Plaintiff:
Charles R. McNichols
Defendant:
Kentucky Department of Corrections, Bobbi Jo Butts, Chris Hatton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniels v. Warden FCI Ashland
as 0:2024cv00039
Petitioner:
Kenneth Daniels
Respondent:
Warden FCI Ashland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Johnson v. Whited et al
as 5:2024cv00094
Plaintiff:
Ryan Johnson
Defendant:
Chris Whited, Lane Irwin, David Stambaugh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
