US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 628
Tackett v. Trevino et al
as 2:2022cv11853
Plaintiff:
Eric Tackett
Defendant:
Trevino, Rutkowski, Page and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. Marburg et al
as 2:2022cv11313
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Edmond Wilson
Defendant:
Marburg, B Carl, K. Parsons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rijos-Mercado v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2022cv11157
Plaintiff:
Evlalio Rijos-Mercado
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Heidi Washington and Cole
Dennis v. Howard et al
as 2:2022cv11118
Plaintiff:
Ray Lynn Dennis
Defendant:
Jeremy Howard and Zuirker
Martin v. Unknown Part(y)(ies)
as 2:2022cv11001
Plaintiff:
Christien Martin
Defendant:
Unknown Part(y)(ies)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Langford v. Detroit Police Department et al
as 2:2022cv10939
Plaintiff:
Kristiel Langford
Defendant:
Detroit Police Department, City of Detroit, Michigan, State of Michigan and others
Miller v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2022cv10934
Plaintiff:
Cordelia Miller
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Dennis Hale, Jesse Swartz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Taylor v. Bean et al
as 2:2022cv10857
Plaintiff:
Davariol Marquavis Taylor
Defendant:
Bean, Johnson and Ingrim
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blaylock v. Adams et al
as 2:2022cv10831
Plaintiff:
James L Blaylock
Defendant:
Adams, St. Louis Correctional Facility, Michigan Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Purdom et al
as 3:2022cv10824
Plaintiff:
Davariol Marquavis Taylor
Defendant:
Purdom, Bean and Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
