US District Court for the Western District of Michigan Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 43
Shepard v. United States of America
as 1:2008cv01216
Plaintiff:
Patricia Shepard
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Yetman v. CSX Transportation, Inc.
as 1:2008cv01130
Plaintiff:
Forrest E. Yetman
Defendant:
CSX Transportation, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Stephans v. CSX Transportation, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv00468
Plaintiff:
Linda Stephans
Defendant:
CSX Transportation, Inc. and Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Bush #379599 v. Michigan, State of et al
as 1:2008cv00454
Plaintiff:
Douglas P. Bush #379599
Defendant:
Michigan, State of, Michigan Department of Corrections and United States Department of Veterans Affairs
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Bentley-Howard et al v. Lafave et al
as 2:2008cv00057
Plaintiff:
Patricia Bentley-Howard and Jack V. Howard, Jr.
Defendant:
Ralph Lafave, Sally Guay and Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Echols v. Grand Trunk Western Railroad Inc.
as 1:2007cv01185
Plaintiff:
Harold Echols
Defendant:
Grand Trunk Western Railroad Inc.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Siddock v. Grand Trunk Western Railroad Inc.
as 1:2007cv00807
Plaintiff:
Robert J. Siddock
Defendant:
Grand Trunk Western Railroad Inc.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Corns v. Grand Trunk Western Railroad, Inc.
as 4:2006cv00150
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Gendron v. CSX Transportation Inc. et al
as 1:2006cv00639
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Thiede v. Canadian National Railway Company et al
as 2:2006cv00184
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
