US District Court for the Western District of Michigan Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 101 - 110 of 255
Adams et al v. Sunlighten, Inc.
as 1:2017cv00868
Plaintiff:
Jared Adams and Jennifer Adams
Defendant:
Sunlighten, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lefebre v. Remington Arms Company, LLC
as 2:2017cv00152
Defendant:
Remington Arms Company, LLC
Plaintiff:
Michelle Marie Lefebre
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Wrongful Death
Latham v. Lowe's Company, Inc.
as 1:2017cv00785
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Latham
Defendant:
Lowe's Company, Inc. and Lowe's Home Centers LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sybesma v. Zev Technologies Inc.
as 1:2017cv00645
Plaintiff:
Aaron Andrew Sybesma
Defendant:
Zev Technologies Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brown v. Monsanto Company
as 1:2017cv00632
Plaintiff:
Robert Brown, Sr.
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Holbrook v. Prodomax Automation Ltd. et al
as 1:2017cv00219
Plaintiff:
William Holbrook
Defendant:
Prodomax Automation Ltd. , Flex-N-Gate, LLC , FANUC America Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hinkhouse v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv00039
Plaintiff:
Melissa Hinkhouse
Defendant:
Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., The Home Depot, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv00146
Plaintiff:
Jones, Holly Jones and Jason Jones
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc, Ethicon, Inc., Johnson & Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Darabos v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
as 1:2016cv01409
Plaintiff:
Janice Darabos
Defendant:
Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Randall et al v. Menard Incorporated
as 1:2016cv01406
Plaintiff:
William Scott Randall and Valerie Randall
Defendant:
Menard Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
